Polity

No-Confidence Motion (WannaBeHPAS)
No-Confidence Motion & Removal of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha

A No-Confidence Motion against the Speaker of the Lok Sabha under Article 94 requires an absolute majority of all the then members, ensuring stability of the office while balancing accountability, neutrality, and constitutional morality.

Model Code of Conduct (MCC)
Model Code of Conduct (MCC)

The Model Code of Conduct ensures free and fair elections by regulating political behaviour and preventing misuse of government power during polls.

S.P. Mittal vs Union of India (1983)
S.P. Mittal vs Union of India (1983)

SC held Sri Aurobindo Society not a religious denomination; upheld Auroville Act, 1980 as valid and non-violative of fundamental rights.

Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)
Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)

Landmark case expanding Article 21; established the Golden Triangle of Articles 14, 19 & 21, ensuring fair, just, and reasonable laws.

Brij Bhushan vs State of Delhi (1950)
Brij Bhushan vs State of Delhi

The Brij Bhushan case (1950) upheld press freedom, ruling that pre-censorship violates Article 19(1)(a) unless justified by public order.

Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala (1986)
Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala (1986)

The 1986 Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala case upheld the right to freedom of religion and expression, affirming that patriotism cannot be forced.

Personality Rights in India
Personality Rights in India

Personality rights protect name, image, voice, and likeness in India, balancing privacy, dignity, and free speech in the AI era.

Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Hindu Succession Act, 1956

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 codifies Hindu inheritance, ensures women’s property rights, and grants daughters equal coparcenary rights.

The Indra Sawhney case (1992)
Indra Sawhney Case (1992)

The Indra Sawhney case (1992) upheld OBC reservations, introduced the creamy layer, set a 50% cap, and reshaped India’s quota system.

Article 16
Article 16

Article 16 ensures equal job opportunities, allows reservations for SCs, STs, OBCs & EWS, and balances equality with social justice.

Article 21
Article 21

Article 21 ensures life & liberty with dignity. Courts expanded it to livelihood, privacy, environment & fair trial.

Article 15
Article 15

Article 15 prohibits discrimination on religion, caste, sex, etc., while permitting reservations for women, backward classes & EWS.

Article 14
Article 14

Article 14 ensures equality before law & equal protection, expanded by courts to curb arbitrariness and uphold gender justice.

Preamble of the Indian Constitution
Preamble of the Indian Constitution

The Preamble declares India as a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic ensuring Justice, Liberty, Equality & Fraternity.

Framework Agreement
Framework Agreement

Framework Agreement marks 10 years of Indo-Naga peace talks, reaffirming NSCN-IM’s call for shared sovereignty and recognition of Naga identity.

NALSA
Legal Aid Services and NALSA

Low legal aid access and underutilised funds highlight the urgent need to strengthen NALSA and decentralise legal aid delivery

Emergency
50 Years Since the Declaration of Emergency (1975–77)

Half a Century Since India’s Emergency Era Source: DD NewsSyllabus: Indian Polity & Governance | Modern History Why In News: Emergency On 25th June 2025, India marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the Emergency (1975–1977), a critical period that significantly impacted the country’s democracy and constitutional framework. What was the Emergency? Events Leading to the Emergency: Key Developments During the Emergency: Aftermath and Reforms Post-Emergency: Conclusion: The Emergency period remains a crucial chapter in India’s democratic journey, reminding

Facebook
Telegram
X
WhatsApp
Email

You May Also Like