PRAHAAR: India’s Integrated Counter-Terror Doctrine for the Hybrid Security Era

PRAHAAR marks India’s shift to an intelligence-led, whole-of-government counter-terror doctrine, integrating prevention, calibrated response, legal safeguards, and societal resilience to tackle hybrid threats across land, sea, air, and digital domains.
PRAHAAR

India’s National Counter-Terror Strategy — PRAHAAR

Syllabus: UPSC GS III – Internal Security

A Comprehensive Doctrinal & UPSC-Oriented Analysis (GS-3: Internal Security)

On 23 February 2026, the Ministry of Home Affairs unveiled PRAHAAR (Policy for Response Against Hostile Activities and Radicalisation) — India’s first publicly articulated National Counter-Terrorism Policy and Strategy. Its release, coming a day after the outline of the National Security Strategy (NSS), reflects a calibrated attempt to consolidate India’s internal security doctrine into a coherent, intelligence-led, whole-of-government framework.

For UPSC aspirants, PRAHAAR represents a landmark shift in India’s counter-terror architecture — from reactive, event-based policing to proactive disruption of systemic vulnerabilities, grounded in constitutional legitimacy and rule of law.


I. Strategic Genesis: Why PRAHAAR Now?

India’s counter-terror efforts historically evolved through:

  • Ad hoc coordination among intelligence and police agencies,
  • Post-incident strengthening of laws (e.g., UAPA amendments),
  • Institutional innovation after major attacks (e.g., NIA post-26/11).

However, the hybridisation of threats — drones, encrypted apps, narco-terror funding, dark web propaganda, AI-driven radicalisation — exposed structural gaps.

The doctrine’s finalisation followed security shocks such as the Pahalgam terror attack (April 2025), which underlined:

  • The speed of modern terror networks,
  • The need for anticipatory intelligence fusion,
  • Integration of kinetic and non-kinetic responses.

Thus, PRAHAAR formalises India’s:

  • Zero-Tolerance Approach, and
  • Whole-of-Government & Whole-of-Society model.

II. Deconstructing the PRAHAAR Framework: The Seven Pillars

The acronym “PRAHAAR” (meaning decisive strike) symbolises calibrated force within democratic constraints.

PillarCore ObjectiveIntended Outcome
PreventionIntelligence-led pre-emptive disruptionEarly neutralisation of modules
ResponseSwift, proportionate counter-actionRapid termination of active threats
AggregationCentre–State capacity integrationInstitutional synergy
Human RightsRule-of-law based enforcementNormative legitimacy
AttenuationAddress radicalisation driversShrinking recruitment pools
AlignmentShape global counter-terror normsDeny safe havens
RecoverySocietal & psychological resilienceFaster return to normalcy

III. Hybrid Threat Matrix: Multi-Domain Recognition

PRAHAAR acknowledges that modern terrorism is no longer confined to physical insurgency.

1. Land Domain

  • Cross-border infiltration.
  • Over-Ground Worker (OGW) networks.
  • Radicalisation hubs.

2. Maritime Domain

Lessons from the 2008 Mumbai attacks:

  • Coastal surveillance gaps,
  • Maritime smuggling of arms,
  • Sea-borne infiltration.

3. Air & Drone Threats

  • Weaponised drones in border states.
  • Precision delivery of arms & narcotics.

4. Digital Domain

  • Encrypted messaging apps,
  • Online gaming chat recruitment,
  • Cryptocurrency funding,
  • AI-generated propaganda.

5. CBRNED Threat Profile

(Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosive, Digital)

Emerging vulnerabilities:

  • Marine toxin threats (e.g., Tetrodotoxin case study),
  • Cyber manipulation of critical infrastructure,
  • Public health emergencies as hybrid warfare tools.

👉 UPSC Link: “Challenges to Internal Security through Communication Networks” (GS-3).


IV. Institutional Architecture: Intelligence Primacy Model

PRAHAAR operationalises coordination through strengthened institutions:

1. Multi Agency Centre (MAC)
  • Real-time intelligence sharing.
2. Intelligence Bureau (IB)

Intelligence Bureau

  • Central intelligence coordination.
3. National Investigation Agency (NIA)

National Investigation Agency

  • Nodal investigative authority.
  • ~92% conviction rate (legal deterrence).
4. National Security Guard (NSG)

National Security Guard

  • Specialized urban counter-terror response.
5. Bureau of Police Research & Development (BPR&D)

Bureau of Police Research and Development

  • SOP standardisation & training modernisation.

Key Reform:

Creation of Joint Anti-Terror Task Forces (Centre–State) to reduce the “golden hour” vulnerability during attacks.


V. Legal Backbone: Deterrence through Rule of Law

PRAHAAR is anchored in a robust statutory framework:

Core Laws:

  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

Human Rights Integration:

  • Protection of Human Rights Act
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

This dual emphasis ensures:

  • Hard-hitting disruption,
  • Democratic legitimacy,
  • Avoidance of communal polarization.

VI. Attenuation & Whole-of-Society Strategy

PRAHAAR recognises that terrorism thrives in enabling ecosystems.

1. Community Engagement

  • Partnership with civil society & moderate religious leaders.
  • Counter-narrative campaigns.

2. Socio-Economic Shield

  • Skill development & education.
  • Preventing youth radicalisation.

3. Prison De-Radicalisation

  • Monitoring ideological indoctrination within correctional facilities.

👉 UPSC Angle: Link to “Role of civil society in national security”.


VII. International Dimension: Shaping Global Norms

Terror financing networks often intersect with:

  • Golden Crescent,
  • Golden Triangle,
  • Narco-terror pipelines.

India leverages:

  • Financial Action Task Force (FATF),
  • United Nations Security Council 1267 Sanctions Committee,

to:

  • Isolate state sponsors,
  • Push for global designation of terror entities,
  • Strengthen extradition & MLAT frameworks.

India’s positioning: Responsible Global Counter-Terror Leader.


VIII. Strategic Strengths of PRAHAAR

  1. Intelligence-led prevention over reactive response.
  2. Integrated federal coordination.
  3. Legal and normative legitimacy.
  4. Hybrid threat adaptability.
  5. Institutionalised resilience planning.

IX. Critical Gaps & Way Forward

1. Narco-Terror Synchronisation

Need deeper coordination between:

  • Anti-narcotics agencies,
  • Financial Intelligence Units.

2. Algorithmic & AI Warfare

  • Clear operationalisation of digital monitoring.
  • Balancing privacy vs surveillance.

3. External Deterrence Clarity

  • Thresholds for cross-border retaliation.
  • Integrating internal CT with external strategic doctrine.

4. Capacity & Resource Gaps

  • State police modernisation.
  • Cyber-forensics infrastructure.

X. Conclusion: Doctrinal Milestone in India’s Internal Security

PRAHAAR marks the transition from fragmented security responses to a consolidated counter-terror doctrine. It integrates:

  • Intelligence primacy,
  • Legal robustness,
  • Technological adaptation,
  • Societal resilience,
  • International diplomacy.

For UPSC, PRAHAAR exemplifies how:

  • Internal security intersects with governance,
  • Federalism influences operational response,
  • Rule of law balances coercive state power.

UPSC Mains Enrichment

Sample Question:

“Terrorism in the hybrid era requires a multi-domain doctrinal response rather than isolated kinetic action.” Examine in the light of India’s PRAHAAR strategy. (250 words)

Keywords to Use:

  • Intelligence primacy
  • Whole-of-Government
  • CBRNED threats
  • Normative legitimacy
  • Radicalisation attenuation
  • Federal security architecture

Latest Articles

Swami Krishnananda

Swami Krishnananda

Swami Krishnananda (1922–2001), disciple of Swami Sivananda, was a leading

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *